Masimo Sues For Patent Infringement Against Apple Watch Health Tech

Mobile Phone

In a recent move, Masimo, a leading global medical technology company, has filed a lawsuit against Apple for patent infringement related to health monitoring features in the Apple Watch. The lawsuit alleges that Apple has infringed on Masimo’s patents that cover important health monitoring technologies.

With the growing popularity of wearables and smartwatches, health tracking has become a major feature for users. The Apple Watch, known for its sleek design and extensive health capabilities, has gained significant traction in the market. Masimo, relying on its expertise in medical technology, has developed innovative solutions for monitoring vital signs and other health parameters.

The lawsuit seeks to protect Masimo’s intellectual property and ensure fair competition in the health tech industry. Stay tuned to see how this legal battle unfolds and what impact it may have on the future of wearable health technology.

Inside This Article

  1. Background of the Lawsuit
  2. Masimo’s Claims of Patent Infringement
  3. Apple Watch’s Health Tech Features Under Scrutiny
  4. Conclusion
  5. FAQs

Background of the Lawsuit

In the world of health tech, innovation is constantly pushing boundaries and improving lives. However, with innovation comes the need to protect intellectual property rights. This has become the focus of a recent legal battle between Masimo, a leading medical device company, and tech giant Apple.

Masimo has filed a lawsuit against Apple, alleging patent infringement related to the health monitoring features of the Apple Watch. The dispute centers around Masimo’s technology for non-invasive, continuous blood oxygen monitoring.

Founded in 1989, Masimo is renowned for its development of innovative medical technologies. The company’s devices and solutions are widely used in hospitals and healthcare facilities around the world. Their non-invasive monitoring technology has revolutionized the way medical professionals administer care to patients, providing vital information in real-time without the need for invasive procedures.

On the other hand, Apple has made significant strides in the health tech sector, particularly with its Apple Watch. The wearable device has become more than just a timepiece, as it now incorporates various health monitoring features, including heart rate tracking and electrocardiograms. These features aim to empower users to monitor their health and make informed decisions about their well-being.

The lawsuit alleges that Apple incorporated Masimo’s patented technology into its Apple Watch without obtaining the necessary licensing agreements. Masimo claims that the infringement is not limited to just one patent but extends to several of their patents related to non-invasive monitoring technology.

This lawsuit has sent shockwaves through the tech industry, as it has the potential to disrupt the rapidly expanding health tech market. Intellectual property disputes of this nature can have significant ramifications, both for the involved parties and for the future innovations in the sector.

As the legal battle unfolds, the outcome will not only determine the financial implications for both Masimo and Apple but will also set a precedent regarding the protection of intellectual property rights in the evolving landscape of health tech.

Masimo’s Claims of Patent Infringement

Masimo, a leading medical device company known for its innovative monitoring technologies, has recently taken legal action against tech giant Apple. The company has filed a lawsuit alleging patent infringement related to the health monitoring features of the Apple Watch.

The lawsuit centers around Masimo’s valuable patents that cover technologies used for non-invasive health monitoring, including the measurement of various vital signs such as blood oxygen levels. Masimo claims that Apple has incorporated these patented technologies into the Apple Watch without seeking proper authorization or licensing agreements.

The patents in question are a result of Masimo’s extensive research and development efforts to revolutionize healthcare monitoring. Masimo’s technology allows for accurate and reliable non-invasive monitoring of vital signs, making it invaluable in critical healthcare settings as well as for personal fitness tracking.

According to the lawsuit, Apple’s incorporation of Masimo’s patented technology into the Apple Watch undermines Masimo’s significant investment in research and development, as well as its competitive advantage in the healthcare industry. Masimo is seeking an injunction to stop Apple from using its patented technology and, if successful, may be entitled to substantial damages.

This lawsuit highlights the critical issue of intellectual property rights in the rapidly evolving field of health technology. It raises important questions about the responsibility of tech companies to respect the patents and innovations of others when developing their own products.

While Apple has made significant strides in the integration of health monitoring features into its smartwatches, it remains to be seen how this lawsuit will unfold. The outcome of this legal battle could have far-reaching implications for the future of health technology and the protection of intellectual property rights.

Apple Watch’s Health Tech Features Under Scrutiny

Apple Watch has been a game-changer in the wearable tech market, capturing the attention of millions of users worldwide. With its sleek design and advanced features, it has become more than just a smartwatch. One of its key selling points is its health tech features, which aim to monitor and improve users’ well-being. However, recently, these features have come under scrutiny as Masimo, a leading medical technology company, has filed a lawsuit against Apple for patent infringement.

At the heart of the lawsuit is Masimo’s claim that Apple has infringed on its patents related to non-invasive health monitoring technology. Masimo is known for its expertise in pulse oximetry, a method used to measure oxygen levels in the blood. They argue that Apple Watch’s health tech features, such as heart rate monitoring and blood oxygen level measurement, use similar technology covered by Masimo’s patents.

While Apple has made significant advancements in health tech, Masimo alleges that the company has not obtained the necessary licenses or agreements to use their patented technology. They argue that Apple’s incorporation of these features in the Apple Watch without proper authorization is a direct violation of their intellectual property rights.

This is not the first time Apple has faced legal challenges regarding its health tech features. In the past, they have been sued by other companies claiming patent infringement in relation to various health monitoring technologies. These lawsuits highlight the competitive nature of the wearable tech industry and the intense scrutiny that major players like Apple face.

Apple Watch’s health tech features have gained popularity among fitness enthusiasts and health-conscious individuals. The ability to track heart rate, workout intensity, sleep patterns, and now even blood oxygen levels has made it a valuable tool in monitoring overall health and well-being. However, the lawsuit from Masimo raises questions about the origins of these features and the potential legal ramifications for Apple.

It is important to note that lawsuits in the tech industry are not uncommon, and companies often resolve these disputes through licensing agreements or settlements. As the legal battle unfolds between Masimo and Apple, it remains to be seen how it will impact the future of Apple Watch’s health tech features.


In conclusion, the legal battle between Masimo and Apple over patent infringement in the health tech industry serves as a reminder of the complex nature of intellectual property and the competitive landscape in the mobile device market. With the rise of wearable technology like the Apple Watch, companies are constantly pushing boundaries to deliver innovative features and functionalities. However, it is important to respect the intellectual property rights of others and engage in fair competition.

Masimo’s decision to sue Apple for allegedly infringing their patents highlights the significance of protecting innovations and ensuring a level playing field in the market. As the case unfolds, it will set a precedent for how future patent disputes in the health tech industry are resolved.

In the end, it is crucial for companies to prioritize proper licensing and legal compliance to avoid potential litigation while continuing to foster innovation and advancements in the mobile tech industry.


1. What is patent infringement?

Patent infringement refers to the unauthorized use, manufacture, or sale of a patented invention. It occurs when someone violates the exclusive rights granted to the patent holder without obtaining proper permission or licensing agreements.

2. What is Masimo?

Masimo is a leading developer and manufacturer of non-invasive monitoring technologies. They specialize in innovative solutions for medical devices and sensors, including technologies related to measuring oxygen levels, pulse rates, and other vital signs.

3. What is the Apple Watch Health Tech?

The Apple Watch Health Tech is a series of features and technologies integrated into the Apple Watch that focus on health and wellness monitoring. These features include heart rate tracking, ECG capabilities, activity tracking, sleep analysis, and more.

4. Why is Masimo suing Apple Watch for patent infringement?

Masimo is suing Apple Watch for patent infringement as they believe that certain health monitoring technologies used in the Apple Watch are infringing upon their patents. Masimo alleges that Apple has violated their intellectual property rights by using similar techniques and technologies without proper authorization or licensing agreements.

5. What are the potential implications of this lawsuit?

The potential implications of this lawsuit could vary depending on the outcome. If Masimo successfully proves patent infringement, Apple may be required to cease the use of the technologies in question or pay substantial damages. It could also lead to changes in the way technology companies approach patent protections and licensing agreements in the health tech industry.